Saturday, 14 November 2026
Bombay High Court
NDPS Act

Exactly 1 kg of Charas Is Not Commercial Quantity, Notification Cannot Override Act: Bombay High Court Grants Bail

Vikas Babbarsingh Itkan v. State of Maharashtra 2023:BHC-AS:31040 Decided 16 October 2023

Published: · NyayVidhan · 3 min read

In Vikas Babbarsingh Itkan v. State of Maharashtra (2023:BHC-AS:31040), the Bombay High Court held that 1000 g of charas, exactly the 1 kg notified as commercial quantity, is intermediate quantity, because Section 2(viia) of the NDPS Act requires a quantity greater than the notified figure and the notification cannot override the Act (paras 7-8). As Section 37 did not apply, it granted bail on stringent conditions to an applicant in custody for over two years (para 9).

Exactly 1 kg of Charas Is Not Commercial Quantity, Notification Cannot Override Act: Bombay High Court Grants Bail

Judgment Intelligence

Bail Granted
Vikas Babbarsingh Itkan v. State of Maharashtra
2023:BHC-AS:31040
Bail Application No. 125 of 2023
Court
Bombay High Court
Date of Decision
16 October 2023
Bench
Justice M.S. Karnik
Relevant Acts & Sections
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — Sections 2(viia), 2(xxiiia), 8(c), 20(b)(ii), 29 and 37; Notification S.O. 1055(E) dated 19.10.2001
Final Outcome

Bail application allowed: the applicant is to be released on a personal bond of Rs 1,00,000 with one or more sureties, report monthly to the investigating officer, attend the trial, not tamper with evidence, surrender any passport and not leave the country without the trial court's permission (para 9).

Source Bombay High Court judgment dated 16 October 2023

Key holdings

  1. Exactly 1 kg (1000 g) of charas, the figure in entry 23 of the notification, is intermediate quantity, not commercial quantity (paras 6-8).
  2. Reading the notified figure as commercial quantity would make the words ‘greater than’ in Section 2(viia) meaningless (para 7).
  3. The notification is subordinate legislation; its ‘commercial quantity’ heading cannot override the parent definition (para 7).
  4. With Section 37 out of the picture, custody of over two years and a completed investigation supported bail; IPC antecedents led to stringent conditions (paras 8-9).

Case explainer by NyayVidhan: an account of this judgment and the law it laid down, not the court's text. The judgment itself is the authoritative version.

Brief Facts

The applicant, accused No. 1 of three, was arrested on 17.08.2021 in a case under Sections 8(c), 20(b)(ii) and 29 of the NDPS Act (paras 1-2). A patrolling party found him carrying a sack which, when searched, held about 1000 g of charas (para 2). Seeking bail, he pleaded that the quantity was below commercial quantity, so Section 37 did not apply, and that he had been in custody for over two years (para 2). The State replied that under the Central Government's notification of 19.10.2001 (S.O. 1055(E)), 1 kg and above of charas is commercial quantity; entry 23 of its table lists 1 kg (paras 3, 6).

Court's Findings

M.S. Karnik J. first asked whether 1000 g of charas is commercial or intermediate quantity, reading Section 2(viia), which defines commercial quantity as any quantity greater than the quantity the Central Government notifies (para 5). Entry 23 of the notification puts 1 kg of charas in its commercial-quantity column (paras 6-7). Treating the notified figure itself as commercial quantity would render the words ‘greater than’ meaningless, and the plain, unambiguous language allows no such reading (para 7). The notification, issued under clause (viia), is subordinate legislation that cannot override the main provision; the two must be harmoniously construed, and the table's heading does not make the notified figure commercial quantity (para 7). Charas must therefore exceed 1 kg to be commercial quantity; 1000 g is intermediate quantity and the rigours of Section 37 do not apply (para 8). The Court agreed with Ratto v. State of Himachal Pradesh and Vakil v. State of Haryana (para 8). Noting over two years in custody, a completed investigation and no NDPS antecedents, but six IPC cases shown by the State, it granted bail on stringent conditions so that he does not evade trial (para 9).

Legal Principle

Under Section 2(viia) of the NDPS Act, commercial quantity is a quantity greater than the figure notified by the Central Government. The notification is subordinate legislation and cannot override that definition, so a recovery equal to the notified figure, such as 1 kg of charas, is intermediate quantity and Section 37 does not govern bail (paras 7-8).

NyayVidhan's view · Practice note

Why It Matters

Among the High Court rulings on the ‘greater than’ rule, this judgment gives the fullest reasoning on why the notified figure cannot itself be commercial quantity: the notification is subordinate legislation made under clause (viia), and its column heading cannot override the parent definition, which would otherwise lose the words ‘greater than’ (para 7). Once Section 37 fell away, the applicant's IPC antecedents did not defeat bail; they led to stringent conditions instead (para 9). Other High Courts take the same view, for example Gyan Chand v. State of Rajasthan (S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 77/2008, 10.04.2012) and Raju Kori v. State of Madhya Pradesh (Misc. Criminal Case No. 43173 of 2023, 16.10.2023). Our explainer collects the wider case law.

Editorial comment by the NyayVidhan Editorial Desk. It is not part of the Court's judgment and is not legal advice.

Precedents Relied Upon

  1. Ratto Vs. The State of Himachal Pradesh Cr.M.P. (M) No. 1101 of 2002
    Relied Upon Discussed at ¶ 2, 8

    Relied upon (Himachal Pradesh High Court, decision dated 13.06.2003): cited for the applicant and expressly agreed with; a quantity must be greater than the notified figure to be commercial quantity (paras 2, 8).

  2. Vakil Vs. State of Haryana 2015(3) PLJ (Criminal) 677
    Relied Upon Discussed at ¶ 2, 8

    Relied upon (Punjab and Haryana High Court, decision dated 01.09.2015): cited for the applicant and expressly agreed with; its para 4, quoted, holds that charas must be more than 1 kg to be commercial quantity (paras 2, 8).

Join our WhatsApp Group
✕

Try: POCSO, IBC, Electoral Bond, Article 370, NDPS Act, Bail Conditions, SC Contempt