Judgment Intelligence
Bail Granted- Court
- Rajasthan High Court
- Date of Decision
- 5 November 2026
- Bench
- Justice Ravi Chirania
- Relevant Acts & Sections
- Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — Sections 8 and 22; Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — Section 483
Bail was granted on a personal bond of Rs 1,00,000 with two sureties of Rs 50,000, to stand cancelled if he is found involved in another NDPS case. The Commissioner of Police, Jaipur, must report on the inquiry within four months; compliance is listed on 3 March 2027 (paras 19-25).
Source Rajasthan High Court, hcraj.nic.in — order dated 5 November 2026
Key holdings
- The police letter of 26 August 2026 was prepared by overwriting its dates to mislead the Court (paras 7, 15).
- The FSL report, collected on 16 February 2026, was kept off the charge-sheet for months (paras 12-16).
- With no antecedents, recovery from another person and a long trial ahead, the third bail was granted (paras 18-19).
- The Commissioner of Police must inquire into the officers concerned and ensure FSL reports reach police stations within 15 days (paras 22-23).
Judgment digest by NyayVidhan: a summary of the court's judgment, not its text. The judgment itself is the authoritative version.
Brief Facts
Court's Findings
Legal Principle
NyayVidhan's view · Practice note
Why It Matters
The order cites no decision and does not discuss Section 37 of the NDPS Act: it records the Public Prosecutor's objection that the substance was still commercial in nature but does not rule on quantity (para 10). Bail rests on the FSL report kept off the charge-sheet, the petitioner's clean record, the recovery from another person and the likely length of the trial (paras 15-18). Where a report is missing from a charge-sheet, this order shows the value of asking the court to call for the FSL's dispatch record and the police station's receipt register (paras 12-13). Compare Dheeraj Singh Parmar v. State of Rajasthan, where the FSL's finding on a seized drug also weighed in favour of bail.
Editorial comment by the NyayVidhan Editorial Desk. It is not part of the Court's judgment and is not legal advice.



