Join our WhatsApp Group
Breaking
Saturday, October 10, 2026 Jaipur Edition
Rajasthan High Court
NDPS Act

Section 51 NDPS Act Prevails Over CrPC: Rajasthan High Court Sets Aside Release of Vehicle Seized by NCB

Published: · NyayVidhan

The Rajasthan High Court quashed a Special Judge's order releasing a vehicle seized by the Narcotics Control Bureau, holding that where the CrPC is inconsistent with the NDPS Act, Section 51 makes the NDPS Act prevail. The NCB may dispose of the vehicle under Section 52A, an interim measure that leaves the owner's rights to be decided in confiscation proceedings under Sections 60 to 63 (paras 7-10).

Section 51 NDPS Act Prevails Over CrPC: Rajasthan High Court Sets Aside Release of Vehicle Seized by NCB
Photo: TrendSPLEND via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0)

Judgment Intelligence

Petition Allowed
Narcotics Control Bureau v. Bhanwar Lal
S.B. Criminal Misc. (Pet.) No. 4670/2021
Court
Rajasthan High Court
Date of Decision
18 July 2022
Bench
Dr. Justice Pushpendra Singh Bhati
Relevant Acts & Sections
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — Sections 51, 52, 52A, 60, 61, 62, 63; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Sections 451, 457
Final Outcome

Petition allowed; the Special Judge's order of 05.08.2021 in Sessions Case No. 565/2021 was quashed, and the vehicle was directed to be released to the NCB, to be disposed of strictly in accordance with Section 52A (para 10).

Key holdings

  1. Where the CrPC and the NDPS Act are inconsistent, Section 51 makes the NDPS Act prevail and the CrPC takes a back seat (para 7).
  2. The NCB's power to dispose of seized conveyances under Section 52A operates through the amendment and the Gazette Notification of 16.01.2015 (para 8).
  3. Disposal under Section 52A is interim and does not prejudice the owner, whose claims are decided under Sections 60 to 63 after the trial (para 9).

Brief Facts

The Narcotics Control Bureau seized a vehicle in an NDPS case. On 05.08.2021 the Special Judge, NDPS Cases, Chittorgarh released it to the owner under the CrPC, although the NCB opposed this under Section 52A (paras 7, 10). The NCB challenged the order, arguing that Section 51 applies the CrPC only so far as it is consistent with the NDPS Act, that Section 52A as amended empowers it to dispose of seized conveyances, and that its inventory verification was complete (paras 2-5). The owner argued that the vehicle's fate depended on the merits and on Sections 60 to 63 (para 1).

Court's Findings

The Court held that wherever the CrPC and the NDPS Act are inconsistent, Section 51 operates and the CrPC must take a back seat; the release, opposed by the NCB under Section 52A, could not have been allowed (para 7). The NCB's power under Section 52A had been brought into operation by the amendment and the Gazette Notification of 16.01.2015 (para 8). The owner's chance under Sections 60 to 63 to redeem the vehicle arises only after the trial; Section 52A is interim and does not prejudice the parties' rights, which the owner may raise when those provisions come into operation (para 9). The Court applied its own decision in Shoyab Khan of 13.07.2022, which held that Section 52A concerns disposal rather than confiscation, to protect seized property against hazards, theft, substitution or lack of storage space, with the proceeds held by the NCB as custodian until the final decision (paras 6, 9).

Legal Principle

Under Section 51 of the NDPS Act the CrPC applies to seizures only so far as it is consistent with the Act. A court cannot use the CrPC to release a vehicle that the NCB proposes to dispose of under Section 52A; the owner's rights are decided later in confiscation proceedings under Sections 60 to 63 (paras 7-9).

Precedents Relied Upon

  1. Narcotics Control Bureau v. Shoyab Khan S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 1918/2017 (Rajasthan High Court, decided 13.07.2022)
    Followed Discussed at ¶ 6, 9

    Section 52A of the NDPS Act provides for interim disposal of seized property, not confiscation; it does not prejudice the owner, whose rights are decided under Sections 60 to 63, and the proceeds stay with the NCB as custodian until then.

NyayVidhan
Court Judgments · 2 min read
Decided: July 18, 2022 Dr. Justice Pushpendra Singh Bhati
PDF
WhatsApp Telegram X / Twitter LinkedIn

✕

Popular: POCSO, IBC, Electoral Bond, Article 370, NDPS Act, Bail Conditions, SC Contempt