Judgment Intelligence
Bail Rejected- Court
- Rajasthan High Court
- Date of Decision
- 9 February 2026
- Bench
- Justice Shubha Mehta
- Relevant Acts & Sections
- Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — Sections 8(c), 20(b)(ii)(B), 23, 29; Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — Section 483
Bail application under Section 483 of the BNSS rejected (para 6), without any comment on the merits of the case (para 5).
Source Rajasthan High Court, hcraj.nic.in — order dated 09.02.2026
Key holdings
- A seizure of 5.920 kg of hydroponic weed, below the 20 kg commercial quantity cited by the petitioner, did not secure regular bail (paras 2, 5-6).
- The Court relied on the drug’s potency and THC content, its value of about Rs 6 crore and the alleged syndicate link (para 5).
- Investigation material of payments from gang members in Indian rupees and Thai baht weighed against bail (para 5).
- Karan Mehra (CRLMB 8926/2025) and Mir Shahid Hussain (CRLMB 13352/2025) were cited; the plea that they involved larger quantities is not discussed (paras 3-5).
Case explainer by NyayVidhan: an account of this judgment and the law it laid down, not the court's text. The judgment itself is the authoritative version.
Brief Facts
Court's Findings
Legal Principle
NyayVidhan's view · Practice note
Why It Matters
This order sits on one side of a Jaipur bench split on hydroponic weed below commercial quantity. The Court looked past quantity to potency, value and alleged syndicate links (para 5), in line with Karan Mehra (CRLMB 8926/2025, 07.10.2025) and Mir Shahid Hussain (CRLMB 13352/2025, 27.11.2025), cited by the prosecution (paras 3, 5). Those orders involved about 18.5 kg and 11.4 kg; the reply that this seizure was much smaller is not answered (paras 4-5). On 22.01.2026, Sushil Kumar v. Union of India (CRLMB 14649/2025), also a Jaipur airport Customs case, granted bail for 6.220 kg below commercial quantity, applying Puranmal Jat; it is not mentioned here. Both lines should be placed before the Court.
Editorial comment by the NyayVidhan Editorial Desk. It is not part of the Court's judgment and is not legal advice.
Precedents Relied Upon
- Karan Mehra v. Union of India (Customs Department), Jaipur S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 8926/2025
Cited by the Special Public Prosecutor as a co-ordinate Bench order refusing bail in a hydroponic-weed case below commercial quantity (para 3); the petitioner replied that the quantity there was much larger (para 4). The Court recorded that a co-ordinate Bench had refused bail in such cases and refused bail (para 5).
- Mir Shahid Hussain v. Union of India (Customs Department), Jaipur S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 13352/2025
Cited by the Special Public Prosecutor as a co-ordinate Bench order refusing bail in a hydroponic-weed case below commercial quantity (para 3); the petitioner replied that the quantity there was much larger (para 4). The Court recorded that a co-ordinate Bench had refused bail in such cases and refused bail (para 5).



