Judgment Intelligence
Other- Court
- Rajasthan High Court
- Date of Decision
- 5 September 2026
- Bench
- Dr. Justice Pushpendra Singh Bhati and Justice Rekha Borana
- Relevant Acts & Sections
- Constitution of India — Articles 21, 48A, 51A(g); Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972; Government of Rajasthan order No. F.3(10) Forest/2014 dated 31.03.2015
Writ petition disposed of with directions. The interim orders merged into the final order, the intervenors were allowed to participate, the interim-relief application was rendered infructuous, and copies go to the respondents and the Chief Secretary (paras 11-16).
Source Rajasthan High Court, decided 05.09.2026
Key holdings
- Caves, breeding sites and corridors on revenue, community or private land are protected whatever the land’s classification (para 6).
- The 2015 Government order barring new commercial activity, mining and land conversion within one kilometre of the Jawai reserves must be strictly enforced (para 11).
- Within one kilometre of mapped caves, dens and corridors, new commercial, residential and civic structures are prohibited, except village abadi homes, repairs, essential utilities, traditional livelihoods and conservation works (para 11).
- Existing structures may operate but not expand, and the Forest Department must publish a provisional geo-referenced habitat map within eight weeks (para 11).
- The safari SOP governs throughout Jawai; night safaris, baiting, spotlights and drones stay banned, as do new mining and corridor-blocking fencing (para 11).
Judgment digest by NyayVidhan: a summary of the court's judgment, not its text. The judgment itself is the authoritative version.
Brief Facts
Court's Findings
Legal Principle
Precedents Relied Upon
- In Re: T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India 2023 INSC 430
A uniform one-kilometre eco-sensitive zone with a ban on permanent structures may intensify man-animal conflict; eco-sensitive zones should regulate rather than prohibit activity and must be specific to each protected area, though mining within one kilometre of a National Park or Sanctuary boundary is impermissible.
- In Re: Issue Relating to Definition of Aravali Hills and Ranges 2025 INSC 1338
Long-term protection lies in geo-referenced scientific mapping, identification of inviolate areas and assessment of cumulative impact before further activity is permitted; not authority for permitting construction in leopard habitat.
- Vellore Citizens’ Welfare Forum v. Union of India (1996) 5 SCC 647
Relied on by the intervening tourism society, which urged regulation through scientifically identified zones rather than a blanket prohibition.

