Join our WhatsApp Group
Latest
Sunday, October 18, 2026
Rajasthan High Court
Environmental Law

No Reduction of Tal Chhapar Wildlife Sanctuary: Rajasthan High Court Strikes Down Road Renotification, Orders Habitat Expansion

Published: · NyayVidhan

On a newspaper report that the State planned to shrink the Eco-Sensitive Zone of Tal Chhapar Wildlife Sanctuary to 3 km, the Rajasthan High Court registered a suo moto PIL and barred any attempt to reduce the sanctuary's area (paras 2-3, 23). Finding a dire need to enlarge the 7.19 sq. km. home of about 4000 blackbucks, it struck down the renotification of a road through it and ordered land merged into forest (paras 17, 23). Compliance monitoring continues.

No Reduction of Tal Chhapar Wildlife Sanctuary: Rajasthan High Court Strikes Down Road Renotification, Orders Habitat Expansion

Judgment Intelligence

Other
Suo Moto: In Re Tal Chappar Sanctuary, Sujangarh (Churu) v. The Principal Secretary, Govt. of Rajasthan, Jaipur & Ors.
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6162/2022 (Suo Moto PIL)
Court
Rajasthan High Court
Date of Decision
31 August 2022
Bench
Justices Sandeep Mehta and Kuldeep Mathur
Final Outcome

Suo moto PIL disposed of with eight directions; compliance report due on 29.11.2022 (paras 23-25). The Court has kept monitoring compliance: the Eco-Sensitive Zone was notified on 27.09.2024, and on 13.10.2026 the case was listed for the week of 02.11.2026. It remains pending.

Key holdings

  1. There is a complete prohibition on any endeavour to reduce the area of the sanctuary (para 23).
  2. The 2019 renotification of a 2.7 km State Highway stretch through the sanctuary was struck down; the road is to be denotified forthwith, as an alternative road borders the forest (para 23).
  3. Objections to the 14.09.2021 draft Eco-Sensitive Zone notification are to be decided expeditiously and the proposal forwarded at the earliest (paras 22-23).
  4. Salt-pan land adjoining the sanctuary is to be merged into forest, and revenue land around Jaswantgarh converted to forest and grassland, under a five-member expert panel (para 23).

Case explainer by NyayVidhan: an account of this judgment and the law it laid down, not the court's text. The judgment itself is the authoritative version.

Brief Facts

The Dainik Bhaskar, Jodhpur edition, reported on 23.04.2022 that the State Government was proposing to reduce the Eco-Sensitive Zone of Tal Chhapar Sanctuary to 3 km under pressure from mine owners and stone crusher operators (para 2). The Court took cognizance on 25.04.2022 and the suo moto PIL was registered; the sanctuary in Churu district covers only 7.19 sq. km. and hosts around 4000 blackbucks (para 3). Impleadment applications were refused, as no order affecting private land owners was proposed (para 7). The District Collector, Churu said a 2.7 km road through the sanctuary, earlier denotified but renotified on 30.09.2019, posed serious risk to wildlife and that an alternate road was available (para 10).

Court's Findings

The Forest and Mines Departments stated that no approved mining lease existed within 5 km of the sanctuary (para 12) and that the draft Eco-Sensitive Zone limits had been proposed for the then blackbuck population, which had grown over seven years and now moved beyond them (para 13). Reading the three departments' replies together, the Bench found "a dire need of increasing the area of the Tal Chappar Wildlife Sanctuary": the blackbuck population had grown, and excess animals strayed outside, risking harm, conflict with farmers and poaching (para 17). As a railway line made a corridor to the Jaswantgarh forest block difficult, it suggested an underpass or relocation to that block, enlarged with revenue land and turned into grassland (para 17). Relying on Hospitality Association of Mudumalai, it held that its power to give such directions was no longer res integra (para 18), and noted the Supreme Court's 03.06.2022 eco-sensitive zone directions in T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad (para 19). As objections to the draft notification of 14.09.2021 had been received, it directed that they be decided expeditiously and the record forwarded to the Central Government (paras 20, 22).

Legal Principle

A sanctuary whose protected population has outgrown its area needs more habitat, not less. The High Court's power to give directions for preserving such habitats in a suo moto PIL is no longer res integra after Hospitality Association of Mudumalai, and it may bar any reduction of the sanctuary and close a road through it (paras 17-18, 23).

Precedents Relied Upon

  1. Hospitality Association of Mudumalai v. In Defence of Environment and Animals & Ors. etc. (2020) 10 SCC 589
    Relied Upon Discussed at ¶ 18

    Wildlife corridors and habitats need legal protection against fragmentation; relied on for the High Court's power to give directions in a suo moto petition on preserving the sanctuary.

  2. In Re: T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India & Ors. Writ Petition (Civil) No. 202/1995, order dated 03.06.2022
    Relied Upon Discussed at ¶ 19, 21

    Every national park and wildlife sanctuary must have an eco-sensitive zone of at least one kilometre from its demarcated boundary, and a wider zone already prescribed or proposed prevails; mining within them is not permitted.

NyayVidhan
Court Judgments · 3 min read
Decided: August 31, 2022 Justices Sandeep Mehta and Kuldeep Mathur
PDF
WhatsApp Telegram X / Twitter LinkedIn

✕

Try: POCSO, IBC, Electoral Bond, Article 370, NDPS Act, Bail Conditions, SC Contempt