Judgment Intelligence
Other- Court
- Rajasthan High Court
- Date of Decision
- 31 August 2022
- Bench
- Justices Sandeep Mehta and Kuldeep Mathur
Suo moto PIL disposed of with eight directions; compliance report due on 29.11.2022 (paras 23-25). The Court has kept monitoring compliance: the Eco-Sensitive Zone was notified on 27.09.2024, and on 13.10.2026 the case was listed for the week of 02.11.2026. It remains pending.
Key holdings
- There is a complete prohibition on any endeavour to reduce the area of the sanctuary (para 23).
- The 2019 renotification of a 2.7 km State Highway stretch through the sanctuary was struck down; the road is to be denotified forthwith, as an alternative road borders the forest (para 23).
- Objections to the 14.09.2021 draft Eco-Sensitive Zone notification are to be decided expeditiously and the proposal forwarded at the earliest (paras 22-23).
- Salt-pan land adjoining the sanctuary is to be merged into forest, and revenue land around Jaswantgarh converted to forest and grassland, under a five-member expert panel (para 23).
Case explainer by NyayVidhan: an account of this judgment and the law it laid down, not the court's text. The judgment itself is the authoritative version.
Brief Facts
Court's Findings
Legal Principle
Precedents Relied Upon
- Hospitality Association of Mudumalai v. In Defence of Environment and Animals & Ors. etc. (2020) 10 SCC 589
Wildlife corridors and habitats need legal protection against fragmentation; relied on for the High Court's power to give directions in a suo moto petition on preserving the sanctuary.
- In Re: T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India & Ors. Writ Petition (Civil) No. 202/1995, order dated 03.06.2022
Every national park and wildlife sanctuary must have an eco-sensitive zone of at least one kilometre from its demarcated boundary, and a wider zone already prescribed or proposed prevails; mining within them is not permitted.

