Join our WhatsApp Group
Latest
Tuesday, October 13, 2026
Supreme Court of India
Criminal Law

Death Penalty: Supreme Court Drops Direction Requiring Trial Courts to Call for Mitigation Reports in Every Case

Published: · NyayVidhan

A three-judge Bench of the Supreme Court deleted the part of its order of 27.04.2026 that required trial courts to call for reports on aggravating and mitigating circumstances in every case punishable with death. On an application by NALSA, it accepted that the direction was unworkable where death is not even contemplated and that trial courts may lack the resources; the direction for High Courts was not touched (paras 1-6).

Death Penalty: Supreme Court Drops Direction Requiring Trial Courts to Call for Mitigation Reports in Every Case

Judgment Intelligence

Other
Aman Singh & Anr. v. The State of Bihar
Criminal Appeal Nos. 2351-2352 of 2026 (I.A. No. 276673 of 2026)
Court
Supreme Court of India
Date of Decision
7 October 2026
Bench
Justice Vikram Nath, Justice Sandeep Mehta and Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh
Final Outcome

NALSA's application (I.A. No. 276673/2026) disposed of: direction 13(A) of the order of 27.04.2026, requiring trial courts to call for aggravating and mitigating circumstance reports, deleted; corrigendum to issue (paras 5-7).

Key holdings

  1. Direction 13(A) of the order of 27.04.2026, binding trial courts, is deleted (para 5).
  2. The Court accepted that trial courts may not even contemplate death in many such cases (paras 4-5).
  3. Lack of resources at trial courts was a further reason (para 4).
  4. A corrigendum and corrected copy are to be circulated to all concerned (para 6).

Judgment digest by NyayVidhan: a summary of the court's judgment, not its text. The judgment itself is the authoritative version.

Brief Facts

On 27.04.2026 the Supreme Court directed trial courts and High Courts to call for reports on aggravating and mitigating circumstances in every case involving an offence punishable with death (para 1). It had found that in many such cases this material was gathered only when the matters reached the Supreme Court, and that order made the direction mandatory for trial courts as well as High Courts (para 2). The National Legal Services Authority (NALSA) applied for clarification, saying the direction to trial courts was not workable and could cause procedural difficulties (para 3).

Court's Findings

NALSA pointed out that in many cases punishable with death the trial court may not even contemplate a death sentence, yet the order of 27.04.2026 would still require it to call for reports on aggravating and mitigating circumstances, and that trial courts may lack the resources or facilities for such an extensive exercise (para 4). The Court agreed with these submissions (para 5). It held that the directions numbered 13(A) in the order of 27.04.2026, which mandate trial courts to call for such reports, deserved to be and were deleted (para 5). A corrigendum was directed to be issued, and the corrected copy forwarded to all concerned after deleting direction 13(A) (para 6). The order says nothing further about the direction applicable to High Courts.

Legal Principle

A blanket direction requiring trial courts to call for reports on aggravating and mitigating circumstances in every case punishable with death may be withdrawn where it is unworkable, since many such trials do not contemplate a death sentence and trial courts may lack the resources (paras 4-5).
NyayVidhan
Court Judgments · 2 min read
Decided: October 7, 2026 Justice Vikram Nath, Justice Sandeep Mehta and Justice Apare...
PDF
WhatsApp Telegram X / Twitter LinkedIn

✕

Try: POCSO, IBC, Electoral Bond, Article 370, NDPS Act, Bail Conditions, SC Contempt