Judgment Intelligence
Bail Granted- Court
- Rajasthan High Court
- Date of Decision
- 25 September 2026
- Bench
- Justice Ganesh Ram Meena
- Relevant Acts & Sections
- Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — Sections 8, 15, 25 and 37; Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — Section 483
The second bail application was allowed: the petitioner is to be released on a Rs 1,00,000 personal bond with two Rs 50,000 sureties to the trial court's satisfaction, and to appear on all dates. The prosecution may seek cancellation if he is involved in a similar case (paras 14-15).
Source Rajasthan High Court, hcraj.nic.in — order dated 25 September 2026
Key holdings
- Only bag 'C', from which the two samples were drawn, could be treated as the alleged contraband; the other four bags were not sampled (para 10).
- At 19.80 kg the sampled bag was below commercial quantity, though the five bags together weighed 79.400 kg (paras 4, 10).
- The Court followed its earlier order in Hariram v. State of Rajasthan, which drew on the Supreme Court bail order in Puranmal Jat (para 11).
- With more than a year in custody, the second bail application was allowed without any opinion on the merits (paras 12-14).
Judgment digest by NyayVidhan: a summary of the court's judgment, not its text. The judgment itself is the authoritative version.
Brief Facts
Court's Findings
Legal Principle
NyayVidhan's view · Practice note
Why It Matters
The order turns on the Magistrate's inventory certificate: two samples, both from bag 'C', none from the other four bags (para 10). Despite the State's plea that the other bags held similar material, the Court treated only the sampled bag as the alleged contraband, following its order in Hariram v. State of Rajasthan (paras 8, 10-11). It is a bail order: no opinion on the merits is expressed (para 13) and Section 52A is not discussed. For investigators, the lesson is to sample every packet, or record that the contents were mixed first (para 11). Compare Mangilal v. State of Madhya Pradesh, where the Supreme Court held a Magistrate-certified inventory and sample list to be primary evidence.
Editorial comment by the NyayVidhan Editorial Desk. It is not part of the Court's judgment and is not legal advice.
Precedents Relied Upon
- Hariram v. State of Rajasthan S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 741/2026, order dated 20.04.2026 (Rajasthan High Court)
Where samples were drawn from only some of the bags seized, only the material in the sampled bags can be treated as contraband; if that is below commercial quantity, bail may be granted.



