ITEM NO.24 COURT NO.1 SECTION XV
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 63878/2026
[Arising out of impugned judgment and order dated 02-07-2026 in SBCWP No. 8936/2026 01-07-2026 in DBCWP(PIL) No. 2586/2026 passed by the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jaipur]
RAJENDRA SINGH & ANR. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. Respondent(s)
(IA No. 323596/2026 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING, IA No. 323595/2026 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T., IA No. 323599/2026 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES, IA No. 323598/2026 - PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES and IA No. 323597/2026 - PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION (SLP/TP/WP/..))
Date : 04-11-2026 This matter was called on for hearing today.
CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JOYMALYA BAGCHI
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE V. MOHANA
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. P.S. Patwalia, Sr. Adv. Dr. Abhinav Sharma, Adv. Mr. R.K. Singh, Adv. Mrs. Neeraj Singh, Adv. Mrs. Puja Sharma, Adv. Mr. Kumar Gaurav, Adv. Ms. Muskan Singh, Adv. Mr. Yashpal Sharma, Adv. Ms. Deveshi Chand, Adv. Mr. Priyanshu Kumar, Adv. Mr. Tom Joseph- 2953, AOR
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shashwat Parihar- 3933, AOR Dr. Manish Singhvi, Adv. Mr. Bhaskar Bhushan, Adv. Mr. Shashank Singh, Adv. Mrs. Ritambara, Adv. Mr. Ashish Mishra, Adv. Mr. C.A. Sundaram, Sr. Adv. Mr. Shivansh Bharatkumar Pandya- 3124 , AOR Ms. Swapnil Singh, Adv. Mr. Vishal Yadav, Adv. Mr. Manan Kumar Mishra, Sr. Adv. Mr. Rajendra Beniwal- 4301, AOR Mr. Ashkrit Tiwari, Adv. Mr. Shiv Mangal Sharma, AAG Mr. Saurabh Rajpal, AOR
[NyayVidhan note: paragraphs 1-5 carry the Court's numbers. This Record of Proceedings is itself the order of the Court; no separate signed order is printed. The lists of counsel are given on one line for each side; the digital-signature block (dated 04.11.2026) and page numbers are left out.]
[Source: Supreme Court of India, www.sci.gov.in — order dated 4 November 2026.]
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
1. Permission to file Special Leave Petition is granted.
2. Delay condoned.
3. The High Court is seized of the matter concerning the election of the State Cricket Association. It seems to us that all the contentions sought to be raised by the petitioners can be appropriately agitated before the High Court. We have no reason to doubt that the High Court will afford an opportunity of hearing to all concerned and pass appropriate orders. All contentions are, accordingly, left open for consideration by the High Court.
4. As regards the appeal preferred by the petitioners against the order dated 03.07.2026, the appellate authority is directed to decide the same, in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from today.
5. The Special Leave Petitions stand disposed of with pending application(s), if any.
(NITIN TALREJA) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS
(PREETHI DILEEP KUMAR) DY. REGISTRAR
Rajendra Singh & Anr. v. State of Rajasthan & Ors.
Source Court's copy
The text below is reproduced from the judgment for reference. The article summarises the Court's decision; refer to the original judgment for the authoritative text.