Judgment Intelligence
Petition Dismissed- Court
- Rajasthan High Court
- Date of Decision
- 29 September 2023
- Bench
- Justices Manindra Mohan Shrivastava and Praveer Bhatnagar
- Relevant Acts & Sections
- Regulations on Graduate Medical Education (as amended by notification dated 22.01.2018) — Regulation 4(2)(a); NEET UG 2021 information booklet — eligibility criteria for MBBS; Constitution of India — Article 141
Appeal dismissed. The Division Bench affirmed the Single Judge's order of 18.05.2022 dismissing the writ petition, holding the appellant ineligible for MBBS admission under the Regulations and the information bulletin (paras 27-28).
Key holdings
- Biology studied only in Class 12 does not meet the two-year Biology requirement at 10+2 (paras 10, 24).
- Tanishq Gangwar allowed Biology as an additional subject; it did not hold one year enough (paras 15, 17).
- An order passed on a concession, or an SLP disposal that did not consider the point, is no precedent on it (paras 19, 21).
- Kaloji Narayana Rao's requirement of Biology in all the relevant years is its ratio (para 26).
- With neither the Regulations nor the criteria challenged, an ineligible candidate gets no relief (para 27).
Case explainer by NyayVidhan: an account of this judgment and the law it laid down, not the court's text. The judgment itself is the authoritative version.
Brief Facts
Court's Findings
Legal Principle
Precedents Relied Upon
- Kaloji Narayana Rao University of Health Sciences v. Srikeerti Reddi Pingle and Others 2021 SCC ONLINE 94 [sic]
There is a rationale and compelling logic in requiring Biology in all the relevant years at the 10+2 or intermediate level; paras 14-15 are its ratio decidendi and are not confined to equivalence.
- Secunderabad Club Etc. v. C.I.T.-V Etc. 2023 LiveLaw (SC) 660
Only the ratio decidendi of a judgment is binding; a decision is not an authority for what can be read into it by implication.
- State of U.P. & Anr. v. Synthetics and Chemicals Ltd. & Anr. 1991 (4) SCC 139
Rule of sub silentio: a conclusion reached without consideration of the point is not a declaration of law.
View all precedents (11)
- Tanishq Gangwar & Others v. Union of India & Others W.P. (C) 6773/2018, Delhi High Court
Struck down the bar on candidates who studied Biology as an additional subject; it did not decide whether two years of Biology could be dispensed with.
- Deependra Sharma v. Union of India & Others S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11747/2019
Disposed of on the respondents' concession; it does not decide the two-year Biology issue.
- Sourabh Kumar Jeengar v. State of Rajasthan & Others S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15014/2020
Decided only whether Biology as an additional subject made a candidate ineligible; the SLP disposal only modified the admission year and did not affirm a one-year rule.
- Dr. T. Rajakumari & Others v. The Government of Tamil Nadu & Others W.P. Nos. 39022 and 36735 of 2015, Madras High Court
Cited by counsel for the appellant in support of his eligibility; not discussed further.
- Rajendra Prasad Saini v. Medical Council of India & Others D.B. Civil Writs No. 14547/2018
Cited by counsel for the National Medical Commission; the Court noted that it held the requirement of study in Biology to be mandatory and supported the respondents.
- Sohan Chouhan v. The State of Madhya Pradesh & Others Writ Petition No. 3619/2022, Madhya Pradesh High Court
Cited by counsel for the National Medical Commission; the Court noted that it held the requirement of study in Biology to be mandatory and supported the respondents.
- Niskarsh Singh Patel v. National Medical Commission & Others W.P. (C) 2606/2022, Delhi High Court
Cited by counsel for the National Medical Commission; the Court noted that it held the requirement of study in Biology to be mandatory and supported the respondents.
- Aayushi Dineshbhai Prajapati v. Union of India & Others LPA 422/2023, Delhi High Court
Cited by counsel for the National Medical Commission; the Court noted that it held the requirement of study in Biology to be mandatory and supported the respondents.



