IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2307 OF 2026
Kavin Kartik (Since minor through mother & natural guardian [name omitted]) & Ors. ...Petitioners
Versus
The Board of Control for Cricket in India ...Respondent
Mr. Kunal Cheema i/by Mr. Datta Mane a/w Mr. Nagendra Dube, for the Petitioners.
Dr. Birendra Saraf, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Ankit Lohia a/w Mr. Ranjit Shetty, Mr. Tejas Gokhale, Ms. Avina Karnad & Mr. Pranav Shetty i/by Argus Partners, for the Respondent.
CORAM : MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, CJ. & ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.
DATE : 10th SEPTEMBER, 2026.
[NyayVidhan note: the name of the first petitioner's mother and natural guardian is omitted. The order carries no neutral citation.]
P.C.:
1. In the present matter, what we find, the Union of India is to be impleaded as party Respondent.
2. The necessary amendment be carried out during the course of the day. Re-verification is dispensed with.
3. Issue Notice to the newly added Respondent, returnable on 14th October, 2026.
4. In addition to Court notice, service by private mode is permitted and affidavit of service be filed on or before the next date.
5. Put up this matter on 14th October, 2026 at 03:00 p.m., ‘For Final Disposal’.
[ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.] [CHIEF JUSTICE]
Kavin Kartik (minor, through mother and natural guardian) & Ors. v. The Board of Control for Cricket in India
The text below is reproduced from the judgment for reference. The article summarises the Court's decision; refer to the original judgment for the authoritative text.