Judgment Intelligence
Petition Allowed- Court
- Rajasthan High Court
- Date of Decision
- 2 January 2024
- Bench
- Justices Pushpendra Singh Bhati and Rajendra Prakash Soni
- Relevant Acts & Sections
- Rajasthan Compassionate Appointment of Dependents of Deceased Government Servants Rules, 1996 — Rule 2(c) (as amended by the Amendment Rules, 2021)
Special appeal allowed and the Single Judge's order of 28.09.2022 set aside. The respondents are directed to grant compassionate appointment to the appellant within three months from receipt of a certified copy of the judgment; all benefits of the appointment operate prospectively (para 30).
Key holdings
- ‘Dependent’ in Rule 2(c) includes a widowed daughter-in-law, read as part of ‘widowed daughter’ (paras 20, 25).
- The question left open by the Division Bench in Smt. Pinki is answered; Sushila Devi, left undisturbed by the Supreme Court, is followed (paras 18-19, 30).
- The 2021 amendment adding ‘married daughter’ to the definition fortifies the inclusive reading (para 28).
- Debabrata Tiwari distinguished: a ten-year delay under circulars and schemes, not statutory Rules (paras 17, 21).
- A three-year delay, with the claim handled till 2014 and benefits settled till 2017, does not bar the claim (para 29).
Case explainer by NyayVidhan: an account of this judgment and the law it laid down, not the court's text. The judgment itself is the authoritative version.
Brief Facts
Court's Findings
Legal Principle
Precedents Relied Upon
- State of Rajasthan & Anr. v. Sushila Devi D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 383/2023, Rajasthan High Court, decided on 04.07.2023
Division Bench judgment of this Court granting compassionate appointment to a widowed daughter-in-law whose husband and mother-in-law (the government servant) had died; same circumstances; followed.
- Sushila Devi v. State of Rajasthan & Anr. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 521/2011, Rajasthan High Court, order dated 19.12.2022
Single Bench order granting compassionate appointment to a widowed daughter-in-law, upheld by the Division Bench; taken into consideration with it.
- The State of Rajasthan & Anr. v. Sushila Devi Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 21240/2023, Supreme Court, order dated 09.10.2023
The Supreme Court declined to entertain the State's special leave petition against the Division Bench judgment in Sushila Devi and dismissed it.
View all precedents (8)
- Smt. Pinki v. State of Rajasthan & Ors. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9177/2010, Rajasthan High Court, decided on 12.09.2011
Purposive interpretation of Rule 2(c): the term ‘widowed daughter’ may include a widowed daughter-in-law; held correct and its reasoning upheld.
- State of Rajasthan & Ors. v. Smt. Pinki D.B. Civil Special Appeal (Writ) No. 1915/2011, Rajasthan High Court, decided on 05.01.2012
Upheld the Single Bench on the facts but left open whether a widowed daughter-in-law falls within ‘dependent’ in Rule 2(c); the question is answered in this judgment.
- The State of West Bengal v. Debabrata Tiwari & Ors. Civil Appeal Nos. 8842-8855 of 2022, decided on 03.03.2023
Relied on by the State on delay in compassionate appointment; distinguished as a ten-year delay under circulars and schemes, whereas the claim here arises under statutory Rules.
- Director of Treasuries in Karnataka & Anr. v. V. Somyashree Civil Appeal No. 5122/2021, decided on 13.09.2021
Mentioned as one of the judgments considered by the Division Bench in Sushila Devi; not discussed further.
- Smt. Sapna v. University of Rajasthan & Ors. D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9686/2020, Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench), decided on 04.12.2020
Mentioned as one of the judgments considered by the Division Bench in Sushila Devi; not discussed further.



