Join our WhatsApp Group
Breaking
Thursday, October 8, 2026 Jaipur Edition
Supreme Court of India
Criminal Law

Supreme Court Lets Bombay High Court Continue Pending Contempt Proceedings but Bars Final Decision Till Next Date

Published: · NyayVidhan

The Supreme Court issued notice on Dilip S. Ghumare's special leave petition against a Bombay High Court order of 01.09.2026. As an interim measure, it provided only that the High Court may proceed with the pending contempt proceedings but may not take a final decision till the next date. The one-page record of proceedings of 10.09.2026 gives no reasons and decides nothing on the merits (paras 1-3).

Supreme Court Lets Bombay High Court Continue Pending Contempt Proceedings but Bars Final Decision Till Next Date
File photo: Supreme Court of India, New Delhi Photo: Pinaki1983 Source: Wikimedia Commons Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0

Judgment Intelligence

Other
Dilip S. Ghumare v. High Court of Judicature at Bombay & Ors.
Special Leave Petition (Criminal) Diary No. 55144/2026
Court
Supreme Court of India
Date of Decision
10 September 2026
Bench
Justice Vikram Nath and Justice Sandeep Mehta
Final Outcome

Permission granted and notice issued, returnable on 28.09.2026; as an interim measure, the High Court may proceed with the pending contempt proceedings but may not take a final decision till the next date. The special leave petition is pending (paras 1-3).

Key holdings

  1. Permission to file the special leave petition was granted (para 1).
  2. Notice was issued, returnable on 28.09.2026 (para 2).
  3. The High Court may proceed with the pending contempt proceedings but may not take a final decision till the next date fixed (para 3).

Brief Facts

The petitioner challenged the final judgment and order of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay dated 01.09.2026 in IA No. 2678/2025, through a special leave petition filed as Diary No. 55144/2026 with an application for permission to file it (cause title). Senior Advocate Vikas Singh appeared for him; no counsel is recorded for the respondents. The record of proceedings does not describe the contempt proceedings, the High Court's order or the parties' submissions.

Court's Findings

The Bench of Justice Vikram Nath and Justice Sandeep Mehta granted permission to file the special leave petition and issued notice, returnable on 28.09.2026 (paras 1-2). Its only interim direction reads: "As an interim measure, it is only provided that the High Court may proceed with the pending contempt proceedings but may not take a final decision till the next date fixed." (para 3). The proceedings were therefore not stayed, but the High Court cannot conclude them for now. The order records no reasons, no view on the merits and none of the remarks made at the hearing (paras 1-3).

Legal Principle

At the notice stage, the Supreme Court may let proceedings pending before a High Court continue while barring a final decision until it hears the matter. Such an interim arrangement decides nothing on the merits (para 3).
NyayVidhan
Court Judgments · 2 min read
Decided: September 10, 2026 Justice Vikram Nath and Justice Sandeep Mehta
PDF
WhatsApp Telegram X / Twitter LinkedIn

✕

Popular: POCSO, IBC, Electoral Bond, Article 370, NDPS Act, Bail Conditions, SC Contempt