Judgment Intelligence
Bail Granted- Court
- Rajasthan High Court
- Date of Decision
- 4 November 2026
- Bench
- Justice Ravi Chirania
- Relevant Acts & Sections
- Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 — Sections 3 and 4; Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — Section 483
The second bail application was allowed. The petitioner will be released on a personal bond of Rs 1,00,000 with two sureties of Rs 50,000 each, must cooperate in the trial and may not leave the country without the trial court's permission; the observations do not affect the trial (paras 14-15).
Source Rajasthan High Court, hcraj.nic.in — order pronounced on 4 November 2026
Key holdings
- The first bail was refused on 30 June 2026 and the SLP dismissed on 15 September 2026; this was a second application (para 1).
- The trial court had refused the agency non-bailable warrants against co-accused, noting a lack of serious interest (para 10).
- The supplementary complaint completed the investigation against the petitioner, and no recovery remained (paras 11-12).
- About nine months in custody with the trial not begun: bail is the rule and jail the exception (para 12).
Judgment digest by NyayVidhan: a summary of the court's judgment, not its text. The judgment itself is the authoritative version.
Brief Facts
Court's Findings
Legal Principle
NyayVidhan's view · Practice note
Why It Matters
The Enforcement Directorate objected that there had been 'no change in circumstances since the rejection' of the first bail (para 7). The order does not use that phrase in reply. Instead it points to what happened after the first refusal: the supplementary complaint completed the investigation against the petitioner, and the trial court's order of 3 October 2026 recorded the agency's inaction against the co-accused (paras 10-12). The order does not discuss the twin conditions in Section 45 of the PMLA. On a second PMLA bail application, counsel should place such later orders on record. Compare Manish Sisodia v. Directorate of Enforcement, where the Supreme Court read the right to a speedy trial into Section 45.
Editorial comment by the NyayVidhan Editorial Desk. It is not part of the Court's judgment and is not legal advice.
