Judgment Intelligence
Reference Answered- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Date of Decision
- 8 November 2024
- Bench
- Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, Justice Sanjiv Khanna, Justice Surya Kant, Justice J.B. Pardiwala, Justice Dipankar Datta, Justice Manoj Misra and Justice Satish Chandra Sharma
- Relevant Acts & Sections
- Constitution of India - Articles 29 and 30, Entry 63 of List I; Aligarh Muslim University Act, 1920; Aligarh Muslim University (Amendment) Act, 1981; National Commission for Minority Educational Institutions Act, 2004
Reference answered: the questions referred were answered in the above terms and the reference disposed of; the papers go to a regular Bench to decide AMU's status and the appeal from the High Court's decision in Malay Shukla (Chandrachud CJI, paras 161-162).
Source Supreme Court of India, www.sci.gov.in — judgment dated 08.11.2024
Key holdings
- The view in Azeez Basha that an institution deriving its legal character from a statute is not established by a minority is overruled (Chandrachud CJI, para 161).
- Article 30(1) protects universities established before the Constitution (Chandrachud CJI, para 160).
- The claimants bear the onus of proving establishment through cogent primary material (Chandrachud CJI, para 142).
- Contributions from other communities do not defeat minority status if the minority shoulders the core responsibility (Chandrachud CJI, para 143).
- Whether AMU is a minority institution is left to a regular Bench (Chandrachud CJI, para 161).
Case explainer by NyayVidhan: an account of this judgment and the law it laid down, not the court's text. The judgment itself is the authoritative version.
Brief Facts
Court's Findings
Legal Principle
Precedents Relied Upon
- S Azeez Basha v. Union of India AIR 1968 SC 662
View that an institution deriving its legal character from a statute is not established by a minority overruled.
- Central Board of Dawoodi Bohra Community v. State of Maharashtra (2005) 2 SCC 673
Rules on references to larger Benches; the 1981 reference fell within them.
- In re the Kerala Education Bill 1957 1958 SCR 995
Article 30(1) covers educational institutions established before the Constitution.
View all precedents (6)
- TMA Pai Foundation v. State of Karnataka (2002) 8 SCC 481
Conditions of recognition must not lead to governmental control of the administration of private educational institutions.
- Prof. Yashpal v. State of Chhattisgarh (2005) 5 SCC 420
Reading of "established or incorporated" in the UGC Act has no bearing on Article 30.
- Dalco Engg. (P) Ltd. v. Satish Prabhakar Padhye (2010) 4 SCC 378
Meaning of "established by or under" a statute does not govern "establish" in Article 30.