Judgment Intelligence
Bail Granted
Abhishek Kumar @ Avashek Kumar v. The Union of India
Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No. 18769 of 2026
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Date of Decision
- 12 October 2026
- Bench
- Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Justice K. Vinod Chandran
- Relevant Acts & Sections
- Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 20(b)(ii)(c), 25 and 29
Final Outcome
Special leave petition disposed of: sentence suspended and the petitioner directed to be released on bail on conditions set by the trial court until the High Court decides his appeal (paras 4-6).
Judgment digest by NyayVidhan: a summary of the court's judgment, not its text. The judgment itself is the authoritative version.
Brief Facts
An NCB team intercepted a truck driven by the petitioner, then 28, with a co-accused helper, and recovered 204 kg of ganja (para 2). The trial court convicted him under Sections 20(b)(ii)(c), 25 and 29 of the NDPS Act and sentenced him to 12 years' rigorous imprisonment and a ₹1 lakh fine; his appeal, citing irregularities in sampling and the absence of independent witnesses, is pending before the High Court (para 1). He has been in custody since 19.05.2022 (para 2). He submitted that he was only the driver with no conscious possession, that the helper's sentence had already been suspended, and that the alleged transporter was on bail (para 3).
Court's Findings
The order gives no reasons beyond a prima facie view. On a prima facie consideration, the Court suspended the petitioner's sentence (para 4) and directed that he be released on bail on conditions fixed by the trial court until the High Court decides his appeal (para 5). It recorded, without further comment, that he had been in judicial custody for over four years and four months, and the submissions that the co-accused helper's sentence had earlier been suspended by the Supreme Court and that the person identified as responsible for transporting the ganja had been granted bail (paras 2-3).
Legal Principle
Suspension of sentence pending a criminal appeal may be granted on a prima facie consideration; here the order records over four years in custody and similar relief to co-accused, though it does not state its reasons (paras 2-5).