Friday, 13 November 2026

A. Tamilarasi v. Government of Tamil Nadu, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of School Education & Ors.

Supreme Court of India · 6 November 2026

Miscellaneous Application Diary No. 62785 of 2026 (arising out of the order dated 23.08.2026 in SLP (C) No. 8051 of 2019)

Source Court's copy

The text below is reproduced from the judgment for reference. The article summarises the Court's decision; refer to the original judgment for the authoritative text.

ITEM NO.14 COURT NO.1 SECTION XII

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION Diary No(s). 62785/2026
[Arising out of impugned judgment and order dated 23-08-2026 in SLP(C) No. 8051/2019 passed by the Supreme Court of India]

A. TAMILARASI Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
THE GOVT. OF TAMIL NADU REP. BY ITS PRINICIPAL SECRETARY, DEPT. OF SCHOOL EDUCATION & ORS. Respondent(s)

(IA No. 322220/2026 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No. 312859/2026 - RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER)

Date : 06-11-2026 This matter was called on for hearing today.

CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JOYMALYA BAGCHI
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE V. MOHANA

For Petitioner(s) : Mrs. Haripriya Padmanabhan, Sr. A.A.G. Ms. Kanika Kalaiyarasan- 3896, AOR Ms. Kavya Venkatesh, Adv. Mr. Rhishigesh Ks, Adv.
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Brijender Chahar, ASG Mr. Ashok Panigrahi, Adv. Mr. Khushal Kolwar, Adv. Mr. Prakash Gautam, Adv. Mr. B.K. Satija, Adv. Mr. Amrish Kumar, AOR

[NyayVidhan note: paragraphs 1-3 carry the Court's numbers. This Record of Proceedings is itself the order of the Court; no separate signed order is printed. The lists of counsel are given on one line for each side; the digital-signature block (dated 08.11.2026) and page numbers are left out.]

[Source: Supreme Court of India, api.sci.gov.in — order dated 6 November 2026.]

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R

1. Delay condoned.

2. The Award dated 23.08.2026 passed during the Samadhan Samaroh was made having regard to the peculiar facts and circumstances of this particular case, without treating it as a binding precedent in any other case. Even otherwise, the awards passed by this Court in Samadhan Samaroh do not have any precedential value. It is clarified that we are not inclined to recall the Award, even though the authorized officers were not present or the officers who were present were not duly authorized to appear. Additionally, it is also directed that no punitive action shall be taken against the officers concerned in connection with the passing of the Award.

3. Miscellaneous Application stands disposed of with pending application(s), if any.

(NITIN TALREJA) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS
(PREETHI DILEEP KUMAR) DY. REGISTRAR
Join our WhatsApp Group
✕

Try: POCSO, IBC, Electoral Bond, Article 370, NDPS Act, Bail Conditions, SC Contempt