Join our WhatsApp Group
Breaking
Monday, September 14, 2026 New Delhi Edition
Rajasthan High Court
Constitutional Law

Vimal Sharma v. State of Rajasthan & Ors. — Rajasthan High Court Disposes of PIL Seeking Dedicated Art Teachers in Government Schools, Notes State's Compliance with RTE Act

Rajasthan High Court disposes of a 2018 PIL seeking regular, dedicated Art Teachers in government schools after the State satisfied the Court that arts education was now being handled by teachers who had studied the subject during their B.Ed. training, in compliance with the RTE Act.

Court
Rajasthan High Court
Case / Citation
2026 LiveLaw (Raj) 377
Date of Decision
September 11, 2026
Bench
Justice Inderjeet Singh and Justice Sandeep Taneja (Division Bench)
Parties
Vimal Sharma (Petitioner) v. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (Respondents), and connected petitions
Relevant Acts & Sections
Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009
Area of Law
Constitutional Law
Headnotes
A PIL filed in 2018 alleged that government schools in Rajasthan lacked properly qualified Art Teachers for Drawing and Music, with existing staff teaching the subjects despite not holding formal Arts qualifications. Acting on the petition, the Rajasthan High Court had earlier called for an action plan from the State toward creating and recruiting dedicated Art Teacher posts. On this occasion, the Court examined the State's affidavit and was satisfied that arts education was being imparted by teachers who had studied Arts as a subject during their B.Ed. courses, meeting the requirements of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009, and disposed of the petition.
Key Takeaways
  1. A State's compliance affidavit demonstrating an alternative but adequate arrangement — here, arts education delivered by suitably trained B.Ed. graduates rather than dedicated Art subject teachers — can satisfy RTE Act obligations even short of the petitioner's original demand.
  2. Courts monitoring long-pending PILs on school staffing will dispose of the matter once satisfied the State has substantially addressed the underlying statutory concern, without necessarily granting the specific relief sought.
  3. Even while disposing of a PIL, a Court can record its view that a dedicated, properly recruited cadre remains the more desirable long-term arrangement.

Full Judgment Text

The Rajasthan High Court has disposed of a long-pending Public Interest Litigation seeking the appointment of dedicated Art Teachers in government schools, after finding that the State had complied with its obligations under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009.

FACTS:
The PIL, filed in 2018, alleged that government schools across Rajasthan lacked teachers formally qualified in Arts subjects, with Drawing and Music instead being handled by staff who had not studied Arts as a subject. During the pendency of the petition, the Court had directed the State to place on record an action plan for creating and recruiting dedicated Art Teacher posts in government schools.

COURT'S ANALYSIS:
The Division Bench of Justice Inderjeet Singh and Justice Sandeep Taneja noted that while the arrangement of using teachers without a dedicated Arts qualification remained less than ideal — observing that "there had to be a properly recruited Art teacher in every Government School" — the State's affidavit showed that arts education was now being imparted by teachers who had studied Arts as a subject during their B.Ed. training. The Bench held this arrangement sufficient to meet the State's statutory obligations under the RTE Act, 2009.

HOLDING:
The petition, along with connected petitions, was disposed of, the Court being satisfied with the State's demonstrated compliance with the RTE Act.

Source: LiveLaw, "Rajasthan High Court Disposes PIL Seeking Appointment Of Art Teachers In Govt Schools, Notes State's Compliance With RTE Act," September 11, 2026.

Cases Cited & References

  1. 1. 2026 LiveLaw (Raj) 377
Nyay Vidhan
Court Judgments · 2 min read
Decided: September 11, 2026 Justice Inderjeet Singh and Justice Sandeep Taneja (Division...
WhatsApp Telegram X / Twitter LinkedIn

Daily Briefing
Stay ahead of every verdict. Court updates, landmark judgments and expert analysis — delivered before 9 AM.

Popular: POCSO, IBC, Electoral Bond, Article 370, NDPS Act, Bail Conditions, SC Contempt