Judgment Intelligence
FIR Quashed- Court
- High Court of Punjab and Haryana
- Date of Decision
- 7 September 2026
- Bench
- Justice Shalini Singh Nagpal
- Relevant Acts & Sections
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 295-A; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 482
Petition allowed; FIR No. 85 dated 30.08.2023 under Section 295-A IPC, Police Station Division 4, Jalandhar, and all consequential proceedings quashed qua the petitioners (paras 17-18).
Source High Court of Punjab and Haryana, decided 07.09.2026
Key holdings
- Section 295-A requires a deliberate and malicious intention to outrage religious feelings (paras 9-10).
- Insults offered unwittingly or carelessly fall outside Section 295-A (Ramji Lal Modi) (para 10).
- A song in a film is an expression of creative liberty and artistic instinct (para 14).
- One individual's grievance cannot portray the sentiments of an entire community (para 14).
- The second-FIR plea failed because this FIR was registered first (para 16).
Judgment digest by NyayVidhan: a summary of the court's judgment, not its text. The judgment itself is the authoritative version.
Brief Facts
Court's Findings
Legal Principle
Precedents Relied Upon
- State of Haryana & Ors. v. Bhajan Lal & Ors. 1992 Supp (1) SCC 335
Categories in which FIRs may be quashed, including where the allegations taken at face value disclose no offence.
- Ramji Lal Modi v. State of U.P. Petition No. 252 of 1956, decided 05.04.1957
Section 295-A punishes only aggravated insults made with deliberate and malicious intention; careless or unwitting insults are outside it.
- Mahendra Singh Dhoni v. Yerraguntla Shyamsundar Transfer Petition (Criminal) No. 23 of 2016, decided 20.04.2017
Not every act of insult falls within Section 295-A; only deliberate and malicious ones do.
View all precedents (6)
- Priya Prakash Varrier & Ors. v. State of Telangana & Anr. Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 44 of 2018, decided 31.08.2018
Picturisation of a song with a wink did not amount to an insult to religion under Section 295-A.
- Manohar Lal Sharma v. Sanjay Leela Bhansali & Ors. (2018) 1 SCC 770
Creative expression on celluloid enjoys artistic licence as part of freedom of expression.
- T.T. Antony v. State of Kerala Criminal Appeal No. 689 of 2001, decided 12.07.2001
Bar on a second FIR for the same offence; inapplicable because this FIR was the earlier one.
