SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
ITEM NO.32 | COURT NO.1 | SECTION II-B
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s).14455/2026
[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 03-08-2026 in CRM (A) No.1748/2026 passed by the High Court at Calcutta]
SUMIT ROY Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
STATE OF WEST BENGAL Respondent(s)
IA No. 229691/2026 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT, IA No. 229693/2026 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T., IA No.230102/2026 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES
Date: 10-09-2026 This matter was called on for hearing today.
CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE; HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JOYMALYA BAGCHI; HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE V. MOHANA
For Petitioner(s): Mr. Gopal Sankaranarayanan, Sr. Adv.; Ms. Aparna Bhat, Sr. Adv.; Mr. Ayan Bhattacherjee, Sr. Adv.; Ms. Karishma Maria, AOR, and others
For Respondent(s): Mr. Tushar Mehta, Solicitor General; Mr. Rajdeep Mazumder, A.A.G.; Mr. Nishant Awana, AOR, and others
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
[NyayVidhan note: the full appearance lists are shortened.]
1. We have heard learned Senior Counsel on behalf of the petitioner and learned Solicitor General of India on behalf of the respondent-State.
2. Having regard to the peculiar facts and circumstances, we are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order. The Special Leave Petition is, accordingly, dismissed.
3. The interim protection, granted to the petitioner, is vacated.
4. All pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(ARJUN BISHT) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS
(PREETHI DILEEP KUMAR) DY. REGISTRAR
Sumit Roy v. State of West Bengal
Source Supreme Court of India (sci.gov.in), decided 10.09.2026
The text below is reproduced from the judgment for reference. The article summarises the Court's decision; refer to the original judgment for the authoritative text.