Judgment Intelligence
Bail Granted- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Date of Decision
- 29 October 2026
- Bench
- Justices M.M. Sundresh and Prasanna B. Varale
- Relevant Acts & Sections
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Sections 323, 376(3), 451, 504; Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 — Sections 5, 6; Information Technology Act, 2000 — Sections 67A, 67B; Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989
Appeal allowed. The impugned order is set aside, the appellant's sentence is suspended during the pendency of his appeal before the High Court and he is to be released on bail on terms to the satisfaction of the Trial Court; pending applications disposed of (paras 9-11).
Source Supreme Court of India, www.sci.gov.in — order dated 29.10.2026
Key holdings
- The Court took the State's figure of 6 years and 7 months as the admitted custody, without resolving the defence claim of more than 7.5 years (paras 5-6, 8).
- That period of incarceration, with the appeal of 2022 still pending before the High Court, was the sole ground for suspending the life sentence (paras 7-8).
- The Court did not examine the claimed discrepancies in the prosecution evidence or the merits of the conviction (paras 5, 8).
- The sentence stays suspended during the pendency of the appeal, with bail on terms to the satisfaction of the Trial Court (para 9).
Judgment digest by NyayVidhan: a summary of the court's judgment, not its text. The judgment itself is the authoritative version.
Brief Facts
Court's Findings
Legal Principle
NyayVidhan's view · Practice note
Why It Matters
For a life convict whose appeal has long been pending in a High Court, this order supports an application for suspension of sentence resting on the custody actually undergone: the Court acted on that ground alone (para 8). Where the period is disputed, it can help to rely on the figure the State itself accepts, as the Court did here (paras 6, 8). It is a short order with no cited authority and no view on the merits. On suspension of sentence while criminal appeals remain pending, see also Smt. Akhtari Bi v. State of M.P.
Editorial comment by the NyayVidhan Editorial Desk. It is not part of the Court's judgment and is not legal advice.
