Latest
Thursday, October 29, 2026
Supreme Court of India
Constitutional Law

Supreme Court Closes Suo Motu Case on NCERT Class 8 Judicial-Corruption Chapter After Revised Text, Apologies

Published: · NyayVidhan

A Bench headed by Chief Justice Surya Kant closed the suo motu case over the NCERT Grade 8 social science chapter that carried a sub-topic on corruption in the judiciary, finding that a revised, balanced text prepared by an expert committee was now in use and that NCERT and the Ministry had apologised (paras 14-15, 19). It discharged the show-cause notices but held the authorities to their assurances on future content (para 16).

Supreme Court Closes Suo Motu Case on NCERT Class 8 Judicial-Corruption Chapter After Revised Text, Apologies
File photo: Supreme Court of India, New Delhi Photo: Legaleagle86 (colour-edited version by Kjetil r) Source: Wikimedia Commons Licence: CC BY-SA 3.0

Judgment Intelligence

Other
In Re: Social Science Textbook for Grade-8 (Part-2) Published by NCERT and Ancillary Issues
Suo Moto Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1/2026 (with I.A. No. 261029/2026)
Court
Supreme Court of India
Date of Decision
1 September 2026
Bench
Chief Justice Surya Kant, Justice Joymalya Bagchi and Justice V. Mohana
Relevant Acts & Sections
Constitution of India (inherent jurisdiction of the Supreme Court)
Final Outcome

Suo motu writ petition disposed of and closed; I.A. No. 261029/2026 disposed of with the clarification; show-cause notices discharged; pending applications disposed of (paras 3, 16, 19).

Source Supreme Court of India (sci.gov.in), decided 01.09.2026

Key holdings

  1. A statement of the Solicitor General recorded in the 22.05.2026 order is not an observation or order of the Court (para 2).
  2. The revised chapter was found objective, factually accurate and balanced (para 14).
  3. The object of the suo motu proceedings stood substantially achieved (para 15).
  4. Show-cause notices to the NCERT Director and the Education Secretary were discharged, but the Union and NCERT remain bound by their assurances on future content (para 16).
  5. Criticism of the judiciary is legitimate but should not enter school curricula without verification (para 18).

Judgment digest by NyayVidhan: a summary of the court's judgment, not its text. The judgment itself is the authoritative version.

Brief Facts

The proceedings began after a newspaper report of 24.02.2026 on NCERT's Grade 8 textbook Exploring Society: India and Beyond, whose Chapter 4 on the judiciary had a sub-topic on corruption in the judiciary (para 4). On 26.02.2026 the Court took suo motu cognizance, finding a prima facie attempt to undermine the judiciary, ordered the book withdrawn, banned its further publication and issued notices to the NCERT Director and the Education Secretary (paras 5-6). Both apologised unconditionally, 82,440 copies were recalled, and the Centre set up a committee of Justice Indu Malhotra, K.K. Venugopal and Professor Prakash Singh (paras 8, 10).

Court's Findings

The Bench first clarified, on an application, that para 5 of its order of 22.05.2026 merely recorded the Solicitor General's statement that the curriculum had not gone before the committee at all levels, and was not an observation or order of the Court (paras 1-3). On the main matter, it noted that the expert committee, working with the National Judicial Academy and the reconstituted twenty-member NSTC, had reviewed Chapter 4 and other material, and that the revised chapter was in classroom use (paras 11-14). Having read the report and the revised text, it found the text objective, factually accurate and balanced, neither glorifying nor unfairly disparaging the judiciary (para 14). Given the apologies, the recall, the reconstitution of the NSTC and the completed review, the object of the proceedings stood substantially achieved (para 15). The Court reiterated that the judiciary is not averse to fair, informed criticism, which belongs in the appropriate forum and not, unverified, in a school curriculum: "The distinction lies not between criticism and silence, but between responsible discourse and uninformed assertion" (para 18).

Legal Principle

Fair and informed criticism of the judiciary is legitimate, but unverified assertions about it should not enter school curricula meant for impressionable minds. Once offending material is withdrawn, revised by experts and apologised for, suo motu proceedings may be closed while holding the authorities to their assurances (paras 15-16, 18).
NyayVidhan
Court Judgments · 2 min read
Decided: September 1, 2026 Chief Justice Surya Kant, Justice Joymalya Bagchi and Justic...
PDF
Join our WhatsApp Group
✕

Try: POCSO, IBC, Electoral Bond, Article 370, NDPS Act, Bail Conditions, SC Contempt