Join our WhatsApp Group
Breaking
Monday, June 29, 2026 New Delhi Edition
Supreme Court of India
Supreme Court

In Re: Right to Privacy in Digital Surveillance — SC Issues Guidelines for State Interception

Five-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court issued comprehensive guidelines regulating state surveillance and phone tapping, holding that blanket interception orders without judicial oversight violate the right to privacy under Article 21.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Case / Citation
Writ Petition (Civil) 44/2024
Date of Decision
May 1, 2026
Bench
Five-Judge Constitution Bench
Area of Law
Supreme Court

Full Judgment Text

JUDGMENT

Writ Petition (Civil) No. 44/2024 — In Re: Right to Privacy in Digital Surveillance

A five-judge Constitution Bench was constituted to examine the constitutional validity of the Indian Telegraph Act's interception provisions in light of the right to privacy recognised in Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) vs Union of India (2017) 10 SCC 1.

HELD:
1. The right to privacy is a fundamental right under Article 21 and encompasses the right to be free from arbitrary electronic surveillance by the State.

2. Interception orders under Section 5(2) of the Indian Telegraph Act must satisfy the three-pronged test of legality, necessity and proportionality.

3. A Judicial Oversight Committee comprising retired High Court Judges must review all interception orders within 30 days of issuance. Any order found disproportionate must be immediately revoked.

4. The affected persons must be notified within three months of the closure of surveillance, except where national security considerations certifiably warrant continued confidentiality — a determination that must itself be subject to sealed-cover judicial scrutiny.

Guidelines issued accordingly. Union of India to file compliance report within six months.
Nyay Vidhan
Court Judgments · 1 min read
Decided: May 1, 2026 Five-Judge Constitution Bench
WhatsApp X / Twitter LinkedIn

Daily Briefing
Stay ahead of every verdict. Court updates, landmark judgments and expert analysis — delivered before 9 AM.

Popular: POCSO, IBC, Electoral Bond, Article 370, NDPS Act, Bail Conditions, SC Contempt