Hari Om Singh v. State of Rajasthan

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17163/2026
CNR: RJHC020828782026 | URN: CW / 35857U / 2026

Hari Om Singh ----Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan ----Respondent

For Petitioner(s): Mr. Sunil Samdaria, Adv.; Mr. Arihant Samdaria, Adv.
For Respondent(s): Ms. Manju Joshi, AGC

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA

Order

07/09/2026

[NyayVidhan notes: (1) this is an interim order; the writ petition is pending. (2) The order has no paragraph numbers; the numbers 1-9 are NyayVidhan's own, added for reference. (3) The number of the government quarter is omitted.]

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been residing with his family in Government residential accommodation No.[omitted], Gandhi Nagar, Jaipur; however, he was served with a notice dated 22.07.2026 with an allegation that some other persons are residing in the aforesaid Government accommodation.

2. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner filed reply to the notice stating therein that at the time of alleged inspection, daughter of petitioner was there in the aforesaid Government quarter, who is admittedly a member of the family.

3. Learned counsel submits that thereafter, order dated 03.08.2026 has been issued by the respondent-department with altogether different allegation that the petitioner has allegedly sublet the aforesaid house. Learned counsel submits that firstly, copy of alleged inspection report was never furnished to the petitioner and even otherwise, there is considerable variation in the initial notice as well as impugned order dated 03.08.2026.

4. Learned counsel submits that after filing of the writ petition, respondent is pressing hard for dispossessing the petitioner by force from the aforesaid house.

5. Learned Additional Government Counsel prays for time to file reply to the writ petition.

6. Learned Additional Government Counsel is granted two weeks’ time to file reply to the writ petition.

7. List the matter on 28.09.2026.

8. In the meanwhile and till next date, the respondent shall not dispossess the petitioner from the aforesaid Government accommodation.

9. Mere presence of Additional Government Counsel in the present order would not preclude the Additional Government Counsel from filing application for stay vacation, if so advised.

(ANAND SHARMA),J