Join our WhatsApp Group
Breaking
Sunday, October 11, 2026 Jaipur Edition
Supreme Court of India
Constitutional Law

Fake 'Medical College' Run From a Farmhouse: Supreme Court Directs UGC and Regulators to Issue Public Advisory

Published: · NyayVidhan

Acting on a report that a fake medical college was being run from a dilapidated farmhouse in Etah, Uttar Pradesh, the Supreme Court directed the UGC and all regulatory authorities to issue a public advisory: no one should take admission in, or deal with, an institution without first verifying its authenticity. The Union of India must monitor compliance (paras 3, 8-9, 12).

Fake 'Medical College' Run From a Farmhouse: Supreme Court Directs UGC and Regulators to Issue Public Advisory

Judgment Intelligence

Other
Ayesha Jain v. Amity University, Noida & Ors.
Writ Petition (Civil) No. 531 of 2025 (IA No. 296269 of 2026)
Court
Supreme Court of India
Date of Decision
9 October 2026
Bench
Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah and Justice N.V. Anjaria
Relevant Acts & Sections
Constitution of India — Article 32
Final Outcome

Directions issued on IA No. 296269/2026; the sealed report resealed and kept on record; matter to be listed on 19.11.2026 (paras 9-13).

Key holdings

  1. The UGC and all regulatory authorities must issue a public advisory to verify an institution before admission (paras 8-9).
  2. The Court welcomed Uttar Pradesh's independent inquiry as a basis for future regulatory guidelines (para 6).
  3. The Union of India must communicate the order to all regulators and monitor compliance (para 12).
  4. Dr. R.M. Sharma may reconstitute the Child Safety Monitoring Committee with four other members (para 10).

Brief Facts

In a pending writ petition on the functioning of educational institutions, Dr. R.M. Sharma, nominated by the Court to assist it, filed IA No. 296269/2026 (para 2). He relied on a newspaper report of 01.09.2026 that a 'medical college' offering D.Pharma, B.Pharma, B.Sc. Nursing, BAMS, GNM, ANM and other courses was running from two or three rooms of an old, unmaintained structure in the middle of a field (para 3). Etah police had acted against the alleged operator and three others; the man shown as the institution's chairman, an illiterate tea seller, admitted signing college documents given to him (para 4).

Court's Findings

The Additional Solicitor General for Uttar Pradesh told the Court that the police had acted promptly, the investigation would be completed without delay and the trial fast-tracked; the Chief Secretary had also ordered an independent inquiry (paras 5-6). The Court found that inquiry necessary so that 'the entire fraud on society is exposed' and the UGC and other regulators can frame future guidelines, and appreciated the State's quick response (paras 6-7). The UGC had written to the State's Higher Education Department after being served with the application (para 8). Accepting a suggestion from the ASG, the Court directed the UGC and all regulatory authorities to issue a public advisory not to take admission in, or deal with, institutions without verifying their authenticity (paras 8-9). Dr. Sharma was also authorised to reconstitute the Child Safety Monitoring Committee first set up by the Delhi High Court, with four members besides the chairman (para 10).

Legal Principle

In a public interest matter on the functioning of educational institutions, the Supreme Court may direct the UGC and other regulators to warn the public, through advisories, to verify an institution's authenticity before taking admission or dealing with it, and may require the Union to monitor compliance (paras 8-9, 12).
NyayVidhan
Court Judgments · 2 min read
Decided: October 9, 2026 Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah and Justice N.V. Anjaria
PDF
WhatsApp Telegram X / Twitter LinkedIn

✕

Popular: POCSO, IBC, Electoral Bond, Article 370, NDPS Act, Bail Conditions, SC Contempt