Judgment Intelligence
Interim Order- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Date of Decision
- 29 October 2026
- Bench
- Justices M.M. Sundresh and Prasanna B. Varale
- Relevant Acts & Sections
- Constitution of India — Articles 21, 25(1)
Interim order; the matter remains pending. The two intervention applications were accepted; green crackers are permitted temporarily under directions A-V and the complete ban returns from 09.11.2026; affidavits are due by 14.12.2026 and the applications are listed on 16.12.2026 (paras 1, 29, 33).
Source Supreme Court of India, www.sci.gov.in — order dated 29 October 2026 · Court's copy
Key holdings
- Bursting is allowed only from 6 to 7 A.M. and 8 to 10 P.M. on 7 and 8 November 2026, never within 300 metres of hospitals, old-age homes, silence zones or educational institutions (para 29).
- Only CSIR-NEERI-listed green crackers in sealed boxes with product-specific QR codes may be made (02.11.2026-06.11.2026) and sold by restored licensees (04.11.2026-06.11.2026) at designated sites; no ladis, Barium or online sales (para 29).
- Traders must furnish a security liable to forfeiture; police patrols will check QR codes, confiscate illegal crackers and prosecute offenders (para 29).
- The complete ban returns from 09.11.2026; AQI reports and affidavits, including hospital admission figures, are due by 14.12.2026, with contempt warned for non-compliance (para 29).
Judgment digest by NyayVidhan: a summary of the court's judgment, not its text. The judgment itself is the authoritative version.
Brief Facts
Court's Findings
Legal Principle
NyayVidhan's view · Practice note
Why It Matters
This is an interim order: the writ petitions stay pending, and the applications return on 16.12.2026 (paras 30, 33). For manufacturers and traders in Delhi-NCR the window is short and conditional: only CSIR-NEERI-listed green crackers in sealed, QR-coded boxes, sold at designated sites, against a forfeitable security (para 29). Officials must file the listed reports and affidavits by 14.12.2026 or face contempt (para 29). The Court said it lacked adequate data to decide on a complete ban (para 25); the reports it has called for cover AQI, sand and water samples and hospital admissions (para 29). Compare M K Ranjitsinh, recognising a right against the adverse effects of climate change under Articles 14 and 21.
Editorial comment by the NyayVidhan Editorial Desk. It is not part of the Court's judgment and is not legal advice.
Precedents Relied Upon
- Arjun Gopal & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors. W.P. (C.) No. 728/2015
The Court's order of 23.10.2018 in this writ petition struck a balance between the competing interests by permitting improved and green crackers instead of a ban; the Court took note of that balanced approach when it issued its temporary directions for 2026.
- M.C. Mehta v. Union of India & Ors. W.P.(C.) 13029/1985
Directions of 11.11.2024 in this case led to the complete ban in Delhi; its order of 15.10.2025, extracted by the Court, temporarily permitted green crackers on the 2018 approach, and the Court granted the 2026 bursting permission on the same lines, taking note of that balanced approach.
