Latest
Monday, October 26, 2026
Orissa High Court
NDPS Act

Hydroponic Weed Is Ganja, Commercial Limit 20 kg: Orissa High Court Grants Bail Over 3.990 kg

Published: · NyayVidhan

The Orissa High Court granted bail to a young accused in a Customs case over 3.990 kg of hydroponic weed (paras 1, 6, 8). Finding no material for a THC-based commercial threshold, it held that marijuana, by whatever name called, is a cannabis product and, as flowering tops, ganja under Section 2(iii)(b) of the NDPS Act; the commercial limit is therefore 20 kg, and the Section 37 bar did not apply (paras 3-5).

Hydroponic Weed Is Ganja, Commercial Limit 20 kg: Orissa High Court Grants Bail Over 3.990 kg

Judgment Intelligence

Bail Granted
Kizakkekalayil Anujikumar Anujith v. Union of India
BLAPL No. 4294 of 2025
Court
Orissa High Court
Date of Decision
8 January 2026
Bench
Justice G. Satapathy
Relevant Acts & Sections
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — Sections 2(iii)(b), 20(b)(ii)(C), 20(b)(ii)(B), 23, 27A, 28, 29, 37; Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — Sections 84, 483; Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — Sections 209, 269
Final Outcome

Bail allowed on bonds of Rs.50,000 with two sureties, on conditions: attending trial (Section 269 BNS on default), not leaving India without permission, giving residence details, Section 209 BNS after a Section 84 BNSS proclamation, and passport surrender; BLAPL disposed of (paras 8-9).

Source Orissa High Court order dated 08.01.2026

Key holdings

  1. Marijuana, hydro-ganja, hydroponic weed or high-grade ganja is a cannabis product and, as flowering tops, ganja under Section 2(iii)(b) (paras 3, 5).
  2. The commercial limit for ganja is 20 kg; 3.990 kg is intermediate quantity and Section 37 is not attracted (para 5).
  3. A THC-based 50-gram threshold failed: no material showed commercial quantity and the schedule does not list marijuana (paras 3, 5).
  4. Carrier role, custody since 14.01.2025, framed charges and no similar antecedents also weighed for bail (paras 6-7).

Case explainer by NyayVidhan: an account of this judgment and the law it laid down, not the court's text. The judgment itself is the authoritative version.

Brief Facts

The petitioner sought bail under Section 483 BNSS in a Customs case, TR Case No. 23 of 2025 before the District & Sessions Judge, Bhubaneswar, under Sections 20(b)(ii)(C)/23/29 of the NDPS Act, on the main allegation of possessing 3.990 kg of hydroponic weed/marijuana (ganja) (para 1). The inventory records eight packets of dried flower/plant-like substance (para 4). Charges were framed by an order of 22.04.2025 (paras 4, 6). The Union of India's counsel submitted that the article fell under serial No. 150 of the notification's schedule, being tetrahydrocannabinol, so that over 50 grams is commercial quantity; the petitioner said it belonged to the cannabis group, with a 20 kg limit (para 3).

Court's Findings

G. Satapathy J. noted that marijuana is not defined anywhere in the NDPS Act, but the Chambers and Oxford dictionaries describe it as the dried flowers of the cannabis plant, also known as ganja, and the prosecution papers themselves describe the article as marijuana (ganja) (para 3). Section 2(iii)(b) defines ganja as the flowering or fruiting tops of the cannabis plant, by whatever name known or designated; the seized packets held dried flower/plant-like substance, so whatever the drug is called, it is cannabis if it is those tops (paras 3-4). No material showed that the quantity seized was commercial, and the notification's schedule does not list marijuana as an item (para 5). Prima facie the article was marijuana (ganja); whether called hydro-ganja, hydroponic weed or high-grade ganja, it is a cannabis product and, under Section 2(iii)(b), ganja, with a commercial limit of 20 kg (para 5). The 3.990 kg seized is intermediate quantity, so the Section 37 embargo is not attracted (para 5). The record also showed the petitioner as a carrier, not the main accused, in custody since 14.01.2025, with charges framed, witnesses yet to be examined and no reported antecedents of a similar nature (paras 6-7).

Legal Principle

Under Section 2(iii)(b) of the NDPS Act, the flowering or fruiting tops of the cannabis plant are ganja by whatever name known, including marijuana or hydroponic weed; the commercial quantity is then 20 kg, and a recovery below it is intermediate quantity that does not attract the Section 37 bar on bail (paras 3-5).

NyayVidhan's view · Practice note

Why It Matters

This is the clearest ruling in the hydroponic-weed set: whatever its trade name, the flowering tops of cannabis are ganja under Section 2(iii)(b), so the 20 kg commercial limit applies, and a THC-based 50-gram threshold failed for want of supporting material (paras 3-5). It runs directly against the Rajasthan High Court at Jaipur in Karan Mehra (CRLMB 8926/2025, 07.10.2025), which refused bail below commercial quantity citing potency, value and organised smuggling. The Allahabad High Court later granted bail below commercial quantity in Mohd Idrish (Bail 23304/2026, 04.08.2026) and Shailesh Kumar Yadav (Bail 35955/2026, 08.10.2026), the latter holding Section 37 rigours inapplicable. Prosecutors relying on THC content will need material showing commercial quantity, which was missing here (para 5).

Editorial comment by the NyayVidhan Editorial Desk. It is not part of the Court's judgment and is not legal advice.

NyayVidhan
Court Judgments · 3 min read
Decided: January 8, 2026 Justice G. Satapathy
PDF
Join our WhatsApp Group
✕

Try: POCSO, IBC, Electoral Bond, Article 370, NDPS Act, Bail Conditions, SC Contempt