Judgment Intelligence
Disposed Of- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Date of Decision
- 5 November 2024
- Bench
- Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Justice Manoj Misra
- Relevant Acts & Sections
- Uttar Pradesh Board of Madarsa Education Act, 2004; University Grants Commission Act, 1956 - Section 22; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21-A, 28, 30 and 246, Entry 25 of List III and Entry 66 of List I; Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009
Petitions disposed of: the High Court's judgment of 22 March 2024 was set aside, the Act upheld except the provisions regulating Fazil and Kamil degrees, and pending applications disposed of (paras 104-106).
Source Supreme Court of India, www.sci.gov.in — judgment dated 05.11.2024
Key holdings
- The U.P. Madarsa Act regulates the standard of education in Madarsas recognised by the Board (para 104).
- The Act is consistent with the State's positive obligation to ensure that students attain a level of competency (paras 72, 104).
- Article 21-A and the RTE Act must be read consistently with minorities' rights to run institutions of their choice (paras 79, 104).
- The Act falls within Entry 25, List III, but its Fazil and Kamil provisions conflict with the UGC Act (paras 99, 104).
- Invalid provisions are severed and the rest of the statute survives (paras 101, 103).
Case explainer by NyayVidhan: an account of this judgment and the law it laid down, not the court's text. The judgment itself is the authoritative version.
Brief Facts
Court's Findings
Legal Principle
Precedents Relied Upon
- Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain 1975 Supp SCC 1
The majority held that the validity of a statute cannot be challenged for violating the basic structure.
- State of Karnataka v. Union of India (1977) 4 SCC 608
The validity of a statute cannot be tested for violation of the basic structure of the Constitution.
- Bihar State Madarasa Education Board v. Madarasa Hanfia Arabic College (1990) 1 SCC 428
The State has the power to regulate the administration of minority educational institutions.
View all precedents (6)
- Pramati Educational and Cultural Trust v. Union of India (2014) 8 SCC 1
A law under Article 21-A cannot abrogate the right of minorities under Article 30.
- Prof. Yashpal v. State of Chhattisgarh (2005) 5 SCC 420
State provisions on universities that conflict with the UGC Act are unconstitutional.
- R.M.D. Chamarbaugwalla v. Union of India 1957 SCC OnLine SC 11
The doctrine of severability: valid provisions survive the invalid ones.