Judgment Intelligence
Petition Dismissed- Court
- Bombay High Court
- Date of Decision
- 31 August 2026
- Bench
- Justice R. I. Chagla and Justice Firdosh P. Pooniwalla
- Relevant Acts & Sections
- Graduate Medical Education Regulations, 2023 (National Medical Commission) — Regulation 21; Regulations on Graduate Medical Education, 1997 (as amended in 2019) — Regulations 11.2.6, 11.2.7; National Medical Commission Act, 2019
Writ petition dismissed; no order as to costs (operative order after para 29).
Source Bombay High Court (bombayhighcourt.gov.in), decided 31.08.2026
Key holdings
- The proviso to Regulation 21 caps attempts at the first year (First Professional MBBS) at four; it does not count attempts subject by subject (para 24).
- Dropping the 1997 wording on ‘partial attendance’ does not change the plain meaning of Regulation 21 (para 25).
- An examination taken in Physiology and Biochemistry counted as an attempt though the student could not take Anatomy (paras 26, 29).
- Rajkumarsingh, where a detained student could not appear at all, was distinguished on facts (paras 28-29).
Judgment digest by NyayVidhan: a summary of the court's judgment, not its text. The judgment itself is the authoritative version.
Brief Facts
Court's Findings
Legal Principle
Precedents Relied Upon
- Rajkumarsingh S/o. Dr. K. B. Singh v. Amravati University, Amravati and Another 1996(2) Mh.L.J. 627
Relied on by the petitioner. A student who could not appear because he was detained for want of attendance, and whose later examinations passed before his result was declared, could not be counted as having failed to present himself; distinguished because the petitioner actually appeared in the first-year examination.
