Court Judgments — Supreme Court & High Court

All Civil Criminal Constitutional

All Courts Supreme Court of India Bombay High Court Delhi High Court High Court of Punjab and Haryana Madras High Court Rajasthan High Court National Green Tribunal — Principal Bench Allahabad High Court Andhra Pradesh High Court Himachal Pradesh High Court Karnataka High Court Madhya Pradesh High Court Orissa High Court

All Subjects Constitutional Law Corporate Law Criminal Law Environmental Law Family Law GST Labour Law NDPS Act

All SLP Appeal Writ Quashing Other Anticipatory Bail Bail Revision

All Bail Cancelled Petition Allowed Petition Dismissed FIR Quashed Other Conviction Set Aside Bail Rejected Bail Granted Conviction Upheld Acquittal Upheld Acquittal Set Aside

All Time Last 7 Days Last 30 Days Last 3 Months This Year

All Acts BNSS CrPC NDPS Act

All Judges Justice Anil Kumar Upman Justice J. B. Pardiwala Justice K. Vinod Chandran

Rajasthan High Court

Section 67 Statements and Vague 'Cooperation' Cannot Sustain NDPS Section 29 Charge: Rajasthan High Court Discharges Accused

The Rajasthan High Court at Jodhpur discharged an accused charged under Section 8/29 of the NDPS Act. It held that statements of co-accused recorded under Section 67 cannot be used as confessions after Tofan Singh, and that a bare allegation that the accused ‘cooperated’ in the narcotic trade, with no overt act, transaction or recovery attributed to him, does not disclose abetment or conspiracy. The ₹68,500 found on him showed no nexus with the offence (paras 9-21).

Decided: 28 Sep 2026

Justice Farjand Ali

Judgment Highlights