Judgment Intelligence
Petition Dismissed- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Date of Decision
- 6 October 2026
- Bench
- Chief Justice Surya Kant, Justice Joymalya Bagchi and Justice V. Mohana
- Relevant Acts & Sections
- Constitution of India — Article 32; Odisha Superior Judicial Service and Odisha Judicial Service (Second Amendment) Rules, 2025 — Rule 18(1)(a)
Writ petition dismissed; the Court declined an individualised determination of the petitioner's eligibility (paras 16-17).
Key holdings
- The one-year practice requirement is a distinct component of the scheme and means practice at the Bar (paras 12-13).
- Treating other experience as practice was a one-time measure for the transitional period (para 13).
- Prior Law Clerkship cannot be counted towards the one year of practice (para 14).
- A bench clerk's service differs in substance from a Law Clerk's and does not count as practice (para 15).
Brief Facts
Court's Findings
Legal Principle
Precedents Relied Upon
- All India Judges' Association and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors. Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1022/1989 (judgment dated 20.05.2025)
Restored a minimum of three years practice at the Bar for Civil Judge (Junior Division) and directed that experience gained as a Law Clerk with Judges or Judicial Officers be counted; that credit rested on a Law Clerk's close association with adjudication and does not extend to a bench clerk.
- Bhumika Trust v. Union of India and Ors. Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1110/2025 (judgment dated 21.08.2026)
Modified the practice requirement: a deemed year of practice for recruitment notified up to 31.03.2027 and, from 01.04.2027, one year of actual certified practice in the District Courts, with training and Law Clerkship after selection.



