Join our WhatsApp Group
Breaking
Saturday, October 10, 2026 Jaipur Edition
Supreme Court of India
Labour Law

Bench Clerk's Service Not Practice at the Bar for Civil Judge Eligibility: Supreme Court Dismisses Plea

Published: · NyayVidhan

A three-judge Bench of the Supreme Court refused to count a District Judiciary bench clerk's years of service towards the one year of practice now required to sit the Civil Judge (Junior Division) examination. The requirement, as modified in Bhumika Trust, is strictly practice at the Bar, and a bench clerk's largely ministerial duties cannot be equated with a Law Clerk's work with Judges (paras 11-16).

Bench Clerk's Service Not Practice at the Bar for Civil Judge Eligibility: Supreme Court Dismisses Plea

Judgment Intelligence

Petition Dismissed
Tapasmita Sutar v. Union of India & Ors.
Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1224 of 2026
Court
Supreme Court of India
Date of Decision
6 October 2026
Bench
Chief Justice Surya Kant, Justice Joymalya Bagchi and Justice V. Mohana
Relevant Acts & Sections
Constitution of India — Article 32; Odisha Superior Judicial Service and Odisha Judicial Service (Second Amendment) Rules, 2025 — Rule 18(1)(a)
Final Outcome

Writ petition dismissed; the Court declined an individualised determination of the petitioner's eligibility (paras 16-17).

Key holdings

  1. The one-year practice requirement is a distinct component of the scheme and means practice at the Bar (paras 12-13).
  2. Treating other experience as practice was a one-time measure for the transitional period (para 13).
  3. Prior Law Clerkship cannot be counted towards the one year of practice (para 14).
  4. A bench clerk's service differs in substance from a Law Clerk's and does not count as practice (para 15).

Brief Facts

The petitioner joined Odisha's District Judiciary as a clerk in 2012, became a Bench Clerk in 2019 and completed her LL.B. in 2021; she cleared the written stages of the 2024 Civil Judge examination but was not selected (para 2). All India Judges' Association (20.05.2025) restored a three-year practice requirement, counting time as a Law Clerk (para 3). Bhumika Trust (21.08.2026) modified it: a deemed year of practice for recruitment notified up to 31.03.2027, and one year of actual, certified practice thereafter, followed by training and clerkship after selection (paras 7-8). She sought recognition of her service as practice (para 9).

Court's Findings

Endorsing Bhumika Trust, the Court held that the petitioner did not meet its conditions (para 11). The three-year requirement has been staggered into one year of practice at the Bar before the examination, a year of training at the State Judicial Academy and a year of Law Clerkship; each imparts a different kind of experience (para 12). Practice is the only component that precedes the examination and the only one that shows a candidate the courts from the side of the Bar; other experience was treated as practice only as a one-time transitional measure (para 13). The Bhumika Trust direction on the source and certification of practice does not carry over the earlier credit for clerkship, which would duplicate a component the candidate must undergo anyway (para 14). In any event, a bench clerk's duties are more ministerial and lack a Law Clerk's close association with adjudication; the distinction rests on substance, not on the name of the post (para 15).

Legal Principle

The one year of practice required before the Civil Judge (Junior Division) examination under Bhumika Trust is practice at the Bar alone; it cannot be met by prior clerkship or by service as a court's bench clerk, whose ministerial duties differ in substance from a Law Clerk's work (paras 12-16).

Precedents Relied Upon

  1. All India Judges' Association and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors. Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1022/1989 (judgment dated 20.05.2025)
    Explained Discussed at ¶ 3, 13-15

    Restored a minimum of three years practice at the Bar for Civil Judge (Junior Division) and directed that experience gained as a Law Clerk with Judges or Judicial Officers be counted; that credit rested on a Law Clerk's close association with adjudication and does not extend to a bench clerk.

  2. Bhumika Trust v. Union of India and Ors. Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1110/2025 (judgment dated 21.08.2026)
    Followed Discussed at ¶ 7-8, 11-14

    Modified the practice requirement: a deemed year of practice for recruitment notified up to 31.03.2027 and, from 01.04.2027, one year of actual certified practice in the District Courts, with training and Law Clerkship after selection.

NyayVidhan
Court Judgments · 2 min read
Decided: October 6, 2026 Chief Justice Surya Kant, Justice Joymalya Bagchi and Justic...
PDF
WhatsApp Telegram X / Twitter LinkedIn

✕

Popular: POCSO, IBC, Electoral Bond, Article 370, NDPS Act, Bail Conditions, SC Contempt