Join our WhatsApp Group
Breaking
Monday, June 29, 2026 New Delhi Edition
Delhi High Court
High Courts

Priya Sharma vs State of Delhi — Custodial Harassment: ₹5 Lakh Compensation Ordered

Delhi HC directed Delhi Police to pay ₹5 lakh compensation to victim of custodial harassment, invoking constitutional tort doctrine and holding the State vicariously liable for fundamental rights violations.

Court
Delhi High Court
Case / Citation
W.P.(C) 8821/2025
Date of Decision
April 16, 2026
Bench
Justice Rekha Palli
Area of Law
High Courts

Full Judgment Text

JUDGMENT

W.P.(C) 8821/2025 — Priya Sharma vs State of Delhi & Anr.

This writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking compensation for unlawful detention and custodial harassment suffered by the petitioner at the hands of Delhi Police personnel.

FACTS:
The petitioner was detained without due process for a period of 36 hours in October 2025. During this period, she was denied legal representation, subjected to verbal intimidation and denied basic sanitation facilities. No FIR was registered and she was released without charge.

HELD:
1. The detention was patently illegal, violating Article 21 and Article 22 of the Constitution. The police personnel acted without any legal authority.

2. The constitutional tort doctrine, as expounded by the Supreme Court in Nilabati Behera vs State of Orissa (1993) 2 SCC 746, squarely applies. The State of Delhi is vicariously liable for the acts of its police personnel.

3. Compensation of ₹5,00,000 (Rupees Five Lakhs) is awarded to the petitioner, to be paid within four weeks.

4. The Commissioner of Police, Delhi, is directed to initiate departmental proceedings against the errant officers within two months and submit a compliance report.
Nyay Vidhan
Court Judgments · 1 min read
Decided: April 16, 2026 Justice Rekha Palli
WhatsApp X / Twitter LinkedIn

Daily Briefing
Stay ahead of every verdict. Court updates, landmark judgments and expert analysis — delivered before 9 AM.

Popular: POCSO, IBC, Electoral Bond, Article 370, NDPS Act, Bail Conditions, SC Contempt