Judgment Intelligence
Other- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Date of Decision
- 28 September 2026
- Bench
- Justice Vikram Nath and Justice Sandeep Mehta
- Relevant Acts & Sections
- Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 — Section 7-Q; Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000
Writ petition disposed of. Bihar and Jharkhand must pay 12% interest on delayed EPF dues and 6% on other dues within three months, pay Rs 1,00,000 to each daily-wager and publish claimant lists within four weeks; untraced claimants may apply within 12 months (paras 58-62).
Key holdings
- Section 7-Q interest on delayed provident fund dues is statutory and is not lost because the principal was later paid (paras 46-47).
- A State corporation's separate juristic personality cannot be used to deprive its employees of dues unpaid for decades (para 53).
- Interest on withheld salary is compensatory, not punitive, and its rate must bear a reasonable relationship to the deprivation (paras 54, 56).
- A flat daily wage applied over decades is not a fair measure of a daily-wager's entitlement (paras 39-40).
- The Court said the reliefs rest on the peculiar facts and lay down no general principle (para 60).
Brief Facts
Court's Findings
Legal Principle
Precedents Relied Upon
- Kapila Hingorani v. State of Bihar (2003) 6 SCC 1
Earlier proceedings in the history of this litigation over the dues of employees of Bihar State corporations, noticed in detail in the order of 29.05.2026.
- Arcot Textile Mills Ltd. v. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner & Ors. (2013) 16 SCC 1
The EPF Act is beneficial social legislation, and interest under Section 7-Q for belated payment is basically compensation to the affected employees.
- Central Bank of India v. Ravindra & Ors. (2002) 1 SCC 367
Interest is compensation for the deprivation of the use of money to which a person is lawfully entitled, whatever name it is called by.



