Judgment Intelligence
Petition Dismissed- Court
- Rajasthan High Court
- Date of Decision
- 29 April 2025
- Bench
- Justice Dinesh Mehta
- Relevant Acts & Sections
- Representation of the People Act, 1951 — Sections 80-A, 81, 83, 100, 123(2); Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — Order VI Rule 17, Order VII Rule 11; Conduct of Election Rules, 1961
The amendment application (I.A. No. 03/2024) was allowed and the amended petition taken on record (para 30). The Order VII Rule 11 CPC application was allowed, following Karim Uddin Barbuhiya, and the election petition was rejected (paras 47-48).
Key holdings
- Citing non-existent ‘Conduct of Election Rules, 1967’ instead of the 1961 Rules is a curable typing error (paras 24, 27-28).
- Pleadings on undisclosed criminal cases need particulars such as FIR numbers and police stations; annexures alone do not suffice (paras 32, 34-35).
- Prima facie, a candidate need not disclose cases in which the police filed a negative final report (para 33).
- An unsigned back of the stamp paper does not invalidate a Form 26 affidavit signed and attested on every page (para 39).
- An election petition without material facts discloses no cause of action and can be rejected at the threshold (paras 41, 45-47).
Brief Facts
Court's Findings
Legal Principle
Precedents Relied Upon
- Karim Uddin Barbuhiya v. Aminul Haque Laskar & Ors. Civil Appeal No. 6282/2023, order dated 08.04.2024; AIR 2024 SC 2193
Election pleadings must be precise, specific and unambiguous; a petition that does not set out grounds under section 100 or conform to sections 81 and 83, or omits a material fact, is liable to rejection under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. Relied upon by the returned candidate and followed by the Court.
- Anil Vasudev Salgaonkar v. Naresh Kushali Shigaonkar (2009) 9 SCC 310
An election petition can be dismissed summarily if it does not disclose the cause of action. Cited by the returned candidate.
- Azhar Hussain v. Rajiv Gandhi (1986) SCC Suppl 315
The power under Order VII Rule 11 CPC ensures that meaningless litigation bound to prove abortive does not occupy the court’s time.
View all precedents (13)
- Revajeetu Builders & Developers v. Narayanswamy & Sons & Ors. (2009) 10 SCC 84
Principles governing amendment of pleadings; relied upon by the returned candidate to oppose the amendment, which the Court allowed.
- Rajkumar Gurawara through LRs v. S.K. Sarwagi & Company Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. (2008) 14 SCC 364
Conditions limiting amendment of pleadings; cited by the returned candidate.
- Jitendra Kumar v. Vishvaraj Singh & Ors. S.B. Election Petition No. 02/2024, order dated 10.10.2024 (Rajasthan High Court)
Where no breach of the Act is pleaded, an election petition ought to be rejected at the threshold under Order VII Rule 11 CPC; cited by the returned candidate.
- Eldeco Housing And Industries Ltd. v. Ashok Vidyarthi & Ors. 2023 SCC Online SC 1612
Merits cannot be examined while deciding an application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC; cited by the petitioner.
- Krishnamoorthy v. Sivakumar & Ors. (2015) 3 SCC 467
Failure to disclose a candidate’s criminal antecedents constitutes corrupt practice; cited by the petitioner.
- Resurgence India v. Election Commission of India & Anr. (2014) 14 SCC 189
Voters have a right to know candidates’ antecedents; a nomination leaving criminal-case particulars blank can be rejected; cited by the petitioner.
- Umesh Challiyil v. K.P. Rajendran AIR 2008 SC 1577
An election petition cannot be dismissed summarily unless the defect goes to the root; cited by the petitioner.
- Ponnala Lakshmaiah v. Kommuri Pratap Reddy & Ors. (2012) 7 SCC 788
Technical and curable defects do not warrant rejection of an election petition; cited by the petitioner.
- Nimmaka Simhachallam & Ors. v. Pamula Pushpa Sreevani E.A. No. 1/2022 in E.P. No. 20/2019 (Andhra Pradesh High Court)
A mere typing error is no ground to reject an election petition; cited by the petitioner.
- Nirmal Singh v. Varinder Kaur Loomba Election Petition No. 3/2012 (Punjab & Haryana High Court)
An Order VI Rule 17 CPC application can be filed even after 45 days from the election; cited by the petitioner.
